 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Volume 2, Number 2, June 2001
Salt – The DASH-Sodium trial Feng J He, Graham A MacGregor Although meta-analyses of trials on the effect of salt reduction on blood pressure (BP) have
consistently shown a significant BP reduction in hypertensive patients, it has been suggested
that salt reduction has little or no such effect in normotensives. In contrast, a recent
meta-analysis by our group, which included studies of modest salt reduction over a prolonged
period, did show a significant decrease in BP, in both hypertensives and normotensives.
In addition, a prospective study of 1173 Finnish men and 1263 Finnish women, in whom 24-hour
urinary sodium excretion was measured at baseline, showed that lower salt intake was associated
with lower cardiovascular mortality, and that this effect was independent of other
cardiovascular risk factors.
More recently, the results of a large, controlled feeding study, the DASH sodium study,
have been published. This study, in 169 hypertensive and 243 normotensive individuals, showed
that lowering sodium intake reduced BP in both populations, while a combination of low sodium
and the 'DASH diet' (rich in fruits, vegetables and low-fat dairy products) had the greatest
effect, reducing BP by 11.5/5.7 and 7.1/3.7 mmHg in hypertensives and normotensives,
respectively.
It has been shown that the fall in BP induced by salt restriction is dependent on the activation
and responsiveness of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). Salt restriction is, thus,
particularly effective in subjects with less RAS responsiveness, such as blacks and the elderly.
The findings of the DASH sodium trial make a strong case for aiming to reduce salt intake in the
general population and support the current government health recommendations of reduction from
10 g to 5 g salt per day. Since, in developed countries, most dietary salt comes from processed
foods, a population-based effort to reduce salt intake will clearly need the cooperation of the
food industry, which have historically, and for commercial reasons been reluctant to make the necessary changes. JRAAS 2001;2:93-95. View full PDF article (open in new window) Email this article Right click on this DOI link and copy link to cite this article (What is a DOI link?)
|
 |