Volume 6, Number 1, March 2005

POPULAR
TOPICPAPERThe DIabetic REtinopathy Candesartan Trials (DIRECT) Programme: baseline characteristics
The DIRECT Programme Study Group

Renin-angiotensin system blockade has been shown to be superior to other antihypertensive therapy in slowing progression of renal disease in diabetic patients, but questions remain regarding diabetic retinopathy. The primary objective of the DIabetic REtinopathy Candesartan Trials (DIRECT) Programme is to examine primary (incidence) and secondary (progression) prevention of diabetic retinopathy when blocking angiotensin II type 1-receptors with candesartan in normoalbuminuric, normotensive Type 1 diabetic patients, and secondary prevention only in normoalbuminuric, normotensive or treated hypertensive Type 2 diabetic patients. The secondary objectives include examining the effect of candesartan treatment on urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER) in each of the three studies and to examine the incidence of proliferative retinopathy in all three populations combined.
Standardised investigations for patients at enrolment include blood pressure measurement, analysis of HbA1C and serum lipids, and a detailed ophthalmological examination. Retinopathy and UAER outcomes are assessed yearly. Retinopathy is graded centrally, based on seven-field stereo photographs using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Randomisation was performed when the results of retinal gradings were available, and treatment with 16 mg candesartan cilexetil or matching placebo was initiated; the dose was increased to 32 mg after one month. Calculations of UAER are based on two timed overnight urine collections.
A sample size re-assessment was carried out when approximately 70% of the patients had been randomised in the DIRECT Programme to ensure the results to be conclusive.
In total, 5,231 patients were randomised in the DIRECT Programme in 30 countries. One thousand, four hundred and twenty one and 1,905 patients are evaluated in the primary and secondary prevention studies in Type 1 diabetes, respectively and 1,905 patients in the secondary prevention study in Type 2 diabetes.
HbA1C showed mean values of 8.1, 8.5 and 8.2% for the Type 1 primary, Type 1 secondary and Type 2 secondary prevention studies, respectively. In the Type 1 secondary prevention study, 49% of the patients had mild nonproliferative retinopathy (level 20) in at least one eye, and 9% had moderate-moderately severe non-proliferative retinopathy (level 43–47). In Type 2 patients, 17% had level 43–47 and the remainder less severe retinopathy.

JRAAS 2005;6:25-32.

PAPERAdditive effects of endothelial progenitor cells combined with ACE inhibition and b-blockade on left ventricular function following acute myocardial infarction
Andrew J Boyle, Michael Schuster, Piotr Witkowski, Guosheng Xiang, Tetsunori Seki, Kerrie Way, Silviu Itescu

Animal studies have demonstrated the efficacy of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in preventing left ventricular (LV) remodelling following myocardial infarction (MI). Preliminary human studies are underway, yet no studies have demonstrated efficacy in combination with standard medical therapy, i.e. angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and b-blockers. Nude rats underwent left anterior descending coronary artery ligation to induce MI. Animals were randomised to receive no treatment (MI, n=5), quinapril 200 mg/L + metoprolol 2 g/L (ACE/BB, n=5), two million EPCs intravenously (EPC, n=5)or both (ACE/BB + EPC [n=5]), then sacrificed after two weeks treatment. ACE/BB resulted in a 75% reduction in fibrosis in the region remote from the MI (p<0.05), but EPC therapy had little effect here. Conversely, EPC therapy induced neovascularisation at the peri-infarct rim, thereby preventing peri-infarct apoptosis by 81% (p<0.05). Acting via different but complementary mechanisms, the combination of ACE/BB + EPCs resulted in a greater overall improvement in LV function on echocardiography than either therapy alone. Clinical trials using stem cell therapy in conjunction with standard medical treatment are warranted.

JRAAS 2005;6:33-37.

PAPERRenin-angiotensin system gene polymorphisms and premature coronary heart disease
Cevad Sekuri, F Sirri Cam, Ertugrul Ercan, Istemihan Tengiz, Abdi Sagcan, Erhan Eser, Afig Berdeli, Mustafa Akin

Introduction: Experimental and clinical studies demonstrated that the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) affects the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and prognosis of coronary heart disease (CHD). The aim of this study was to investigate the genotype distribution and the allele frequencies of three RAS genes polymorphisms and their effects on premature CHD in a Turkish population.
Materials and methods: One-hundred and fifteen Turkish patients with premature CHD and 128 controls were included into the study. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor and angiotensinogen (AGT) gene polymorphisms were analysed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP).
Results: The patients group showed an increased frequency of the ACE D allele compared with controls (65% vs. 35%, p=0.0001). There was a significant association between the DD genotype and premature CHD (ACE DD vs. ID and II; odds ratio [OR]=2.82 [CI 95% 1.33–2.91, p=0.002]). Also, we observed increased premature CHD risk associated with higher frequencies of the AGT MM genotype in patients when compared with controls (AGT MM vs. TT and MT, OR=1.92 [CI 95% 1.11–3.33, p=0.018]). We found a significant association between AT1-receptor AA genotype and decreased risk of premature CHD (AT1R AA vs. AC and CC, OR= 0.57[CI 95% 0.34–0.95, p=0.03]).
Conclusions: We demonstrated that increased premature CHD risk is associated with higher frequencies of the ACE DD and AGT MM genotypes. These findings indicate a synergistic contribution of ACE DD and AGT MM polymorphisms to the development of premature CHD. Also, our results suggest that family history, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, obesity and ACE DD genotype were independent risk factors for premature CHD.

JRAAS 2005;6:38-42.

POPULAR
TOPICPAPERAngiotensin II receptor blockade and ventricular remodelling
Nagesh S Anavekar, Scott D Solomon

Cardiac remodelling is the expression of molecular, cellular and interstitial changes in response to cardiac injury, manifesting as adverse alterations in the size, shape and function of the ventricle. Several clinical studies have documented significant elevations in the levels of renin, angiotensin II (Ang II) and aldosterone attending acute myocardial infarction and/or congestive heart failure. Similar to catecholamines, markedly elevated activity of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is associated with poor prognosis. The effects of Ang II upon cardiac tissue are related to two primary receptors, Ang II type 1 (AT1) and Ang II type 2 (AT2). The AT1-receptor appears to mediate many of the deleterious effects of chronic RAAS activity, while the AT2-receptor is increasingly shown to have potential cardioprotective effects. Attenuating the deleterious effects of sustained Ang II stimulation can be achieved by direct inhibition of angiotensin- converting enzyme (ACE) and/or direct antagonism of AT receptors. ACE inhibition reduces left ventricular (LV) volumes, retards the progression of LV dilatation and hypertrophy and increases systolic function in systolic dysfunction. By blocking at the receptor level, Ang II receptor blockers (ARBs) provide an alternative and more direct approach to inhibiting the effects of Ang II; however, data relating to their effects upon ventricular remodelling, whether used in isolation or in combination with ACE inhibitors (ACE-Is), are less convincing. Data arising from several recent clinical trials suggest that simultaneous use of ACE-Is and ARBs maybe of more benefit in attenuating ventricular remodelling than either agent alone.

JRAAS 2005;6:43-48.

EDITORIAL REVIEWPreventing end stage renal disease in diabetic patients – genetic aspect (part I)
Peter Karl Jacobsen

Diabetic nephropathy is a major cause of diabetes- related morbidity and mortality; however the clinical course of the disease and the renal prognosis is highly variable among individuals. The current review will discuss the genetic influence on the development of end stage renal disease (ESRD) in diabetic patients and potential improvements to the current treatment strategy to slow the loss of kidney function in these patients. In this first part, the growing evidence that glucose-induced activation of the intra-renal and systemic renin-angiotensin systems plays an essential role in processes leading to destruction of renal function is summarised. Genetic variations, especially the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)/ID polymorphisms in the gene coding for ACE, are involved in activation of the renin-angiotensin system and seem to influence the clinical course of diabetic nephropathy during treatment with ACE inhibitors. In addition, this polymorphism may interact with other polymorphisms within the renin-angiotensin system, leading to high risk of ESRD. As new genetic approaches and methods develop, further understanding of diabetic nephropathy will evolve and genotyping will help prevent ESRD in diabetic patients.

JRAAS 2005;6:1-14.

POPULAR
TOPICEDITORIAL REVIEWMolecular-specific effects of angiotensin II antagonists: clinical relevance to treating hypertension?
John L Reid

Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) may produce a number of molecule-specific effects that appear to be independent of interaction with the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1)-receptor. These include antagonism of the thromboxane A2 receptor, inhibition of platelet aggregation, induction of peroxisome proliferator- activated receptor gamma (PPARg) activity, and reduction of serum uric acid levels. However, definitive evidence is lacking that these molecule-specific effects give rise to a therapeutic advantage of one ARB over another. Currently, the possibility of a link between a molecule-specific effect of an ARB and an improvement in clinical outcomes is best illustrated by a reduction in serum uric acid levels with losartan. Data from Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study suggest a treatment-induced decrease in serum uric acid may contribute to the treatment benefit of a losartan-based versus atenolol-based therapy on the composite endpoint (death, myocardial infarction, or stroke). This finding should prompt further studies to investigate the long-term cardioprotective benefits issue of reducing hyperuricaemia in hypertensive patients.

JRAAS 2005;6:15-24.