![]() |
12th May 2008 @ 2:04am |
| Subscribe | Instructions To Authors | Advertising/Supplements | Contact Us | Help |
|
Volume 3, Number 3, September 2002PAPERStimulation of collagen gel contraction by angiotensin II and III in cardiac fibroblasts Objective:
The aim of the present study was to investigate whether angiotensin II (Ang II), angiotensin III (Ang III) or Ang II (2-8), angiotensin IV (Ang IV) or Ang II (3-8) and Ang II (1-7), Ang II (4-8), Ang II (5-8) and Ang II (1-4) can stimulate collagen gel contraction in cardiac fibroblasts in serum-free conditions. JRAAS 2002;3:160-166. PAPERAntiproteinuric effect of candesartan cilexetil in patients with chronic glomerulonephritis A prospective, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, dose-response trial was conducted to investigate the antiproteinuric effect of candesartan cilexetil, the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker, in patients with chronic glomerulonephritis. Patients (n=280) were treated for 12 weeks with candesartan cilexetil 2, 4, or 8 mg given orally once-daily (o.d.). The improvement in urinary protein excretion observed at the end of the treatment period was 15.9% in the 2 mg group, 25.6% in the 4 mg group, and 34.6% in the 8 mg group, respectively, showing a clear dose-response (2 mg <4 mg <8 mg; p=0.003). The mean reduction in urinary protein excretion was 11.3% in the 2 mg group, 26.3% in the 4 mg group, and 26.0% in the 8 mg group, showing a dose-response pattern, in that the effect of 4 mg and 8 mg was greater than that of 2 mg (2 mg <4 mg ≈8 mg; p=0.010). As the observed reduction in urinary protein excretion failed to correlate with changes in mean blood pressure, it could not be attributed to the antihypertensive effect of the study drug alone. This suggests that candesartan cilexetil, 4–8 mg o.d., has antiproteinuric effects in patients with chronic glomerulonephritis. JRAAS 2002;3:167-175. POPULAR Arterial wall stiffness, an important independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease in patients with hypertension, is worsened by the coexistence of diabetes mellitus. This randomised, prospective, double-blind, crossover trial assessed the effects of telmisartan on arterial stiffness in patients with Type 2 diabetes with essential hypertension. After a two-week placebo wash out period, 28 ambulatory patients received telmisartan (40 mg) or placebo for three weeks. Following a second two-week placebo wash out period, patients received the alternate treatment for a further three weeks. Augmentation index and central blood pressure (BP) were determined using the SphygmoCor™ device and pulse wave velocity (PWV) was measured using an automatic device, the Complior™, at the beginning and the end of each period. Telmisartan significantly reduced the carotid–femoral PWV compared with placebo (mean adjusted treatment difference –0.95 m/s; 95% CI: –1.67, –0.23 m/s; p=0.013). Peripheral and central diastolic, systolic and pulse pressures were also significantly reduced with telmisartan compared with placebo. In conclusion, telmisartan reduces arterial stiffness and peripheral and central BPs as assessed by PWV and pulse contour analysis in hypertensive patients with Type 2 diabetes. These properties of telmisartan suggest that it may improve cardiovascular outcome in this patient population. JRAAS 2002;3:176-180. PAPERInvolvement of the AT2-receptor in angiotensin II-induced facilitation of sympathetic neurotransmission Angiotensin II (Ang II) causes facilitation of sympathetic neurotransmission via prejunctionally-located AT1-receptors. The pithed rat is a suitable model to study the interactions between endogenously produced Ang II and the sympathetic nervous system at the peripheral level. Previously, we demonstrated that inhibition of the facilitatory actions of Ang II is a class effect of all AT1-receptor blockers (ARB). However, all ARBs caused less than maximal inhibition after the highest dose, thus causing a U-shaped dose-response curve with respect to sympatho-inhibition. In the present study, we investigated whether the AT2-receptor is involved in this ‘upturn’ of the dose-response relationship. Accordingly, we studied the effect of the ARB, irbesartan (1–60 mg/kg), on the sequelae of electric stimulation of the thoraco-lumbar sympathetic outflow in the presence and absence of the AT2-blocker, PD 123319 (0.5 mg/kg +50 µg/kg/min). Additionally, the effect of the combined (non- selective) AT1/AT2-receptor antagonist saralasin (0.001, 0.003, 0.01 or 0.03 mg/kg/min), on stimulation-induced responses was studied. In addition, we measured PRA-levels after administration of irbesartan, in this model. JRAAS 2002;3:181-187. POPULAR Hypothesis/introduction:
The risks and benefits of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) after cardiac events are unknown. We sought to determine the independent effect of ACE inhibitors (ACE-I) on long-term mortality in ESRD patients after cardiac events. JRAAS 2002;3:188-191. POPULAR Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is more than just an adaptive response to hypertension. It predicts a poor prognosis independently of the blood pressure (BP) level. There is increasing evidence from studies such as Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) and Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) that LVH should be a target for treatment, above and beyond BP control. It is likely that drugs blocking the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system cause greater regression of LVH than other agents and this is probably the mechanism that explains the superiority of losartan over atenolol in the LIFE study. In order to achieve the stringent BP goals suggested by modern guidelines, most patients will require multiple antihypertensive agents and the clinical choices relate more often to which combinations of drugs are most appropriate, rather than which single drug is the best. Tight BP control should be the first priority and this is likely to lead to regression of LVH. JRAAS 2002;3:141-144. EDITORIAL REVIEWDevelopments in restenosis Restenosis is a major complication leading to the failure of vascular procedures, including surgery, angioplasty and stenting. Major efforts including over 100 clinical trials have been made to overcome this complication, with little success to date. Issues relating to trial rationale, design, measurement and biology are addressed in this review. JRAAS 2002;3:145-149. POPULAR Interest in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) has increased since the development of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. It has been discovered that the potential uses of this class of treatment extend far beyond their initial developmental role as antihypertensives, and they are now used routinely in the treatment of heart failure, nephropathy, myocardial infarction and diabetes. However, there is more to RAAS blockade than just inhibition of angiotensin II, and inhibition of aldosterone is becoming recognised as an additional therapeutic manoeuvre in chronic heart failure. JRAAS 2002;3:150-155. EDITORIAL REVIEWVasopeptidase inhibitors in heart failure Considerable attention has recently focused on the vasopeptidase inhibitors (VPI), a new class of drug that combines angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor activity with inhibition of natriuretic peptide breakdown. In theory, a drug with these properties may be beneficial both in hypertension and in heart failure. Whilst the efficacy of VPIs in hypertension has been consistently demonstrated in pre-clinical and clinical studies, the role of VPIs, if any, in heart failure is less clear, since numerous small studies have produced conflicting results. Furthermore, preliminary results from the recently completed Omapatrilat Versus Enalapril Randomised Trial of Utility in Reducing Events (OVERTURE) study have failed to establish the VPI, omapatrilat, as a first line therapy in the treatment of chronic heart failure. We review the literature on VPIs in heart failure and discuss possible reasons for the reported lack of benefit over ACE inhibitors. JRAAS 2002;3:156-159. |