12th May 2008 @ 2:43am
 Subscribe | Instructions To Authors | Advertising/Supplements | Contact Us | Help

Volume 1, Number 2, June 2000


POPULAR
TOPIC
PAPERCombination of non-hypotensive doses of valsartan and enalapril improves survival of spontaneously hypertensive rats with endothelial dysfunction
Marc de Gasparo, Patrick Hess, Barbara Nuesslein-Hildesheim, Patrick Bruneval, Jean-Paul Clozel

There is increasing evidence to suggest endothelial dysfunction as a critical factor in vascular diseases. Genetically predisposed spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) treated with inhibitors of nitric oxide (NO) synthase, develop a severe hypertensive nephrosclerosis without the necessity for surgical reduction in renal mass, nephrectomy, renal infarction or nephrotoxic drugs. In these animals, endothelial dysfunction is considered a valid model for assessment of the efficacy of cardiovascular therapy. SHR were treated with either the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril or the angiotensin II (Ang II) AT1-receptor antagonist (AIIA) valsartan at sub-hypotensive doses and the effects on survival rates, cardiac and renal changes were monitored. Rats treated with valsartan, alone or in combination with enalapril, showed markedly higher survival rates (67–85%, respectively) than untreated animals (37%) or those treated with enalapril alone (55%). Valsartan at a dose which attenuated blood pressure increase led to even greater survival rates (95%). Despite these improved survival rates, at non-hypotensive doses the drugs had no effect on histological appearance, nor was kidney function improved. Plasma creatinine levels were reduced by valsartan, alone or in combination with enalapril, but proteinuria persisted with all treatments over the 12 weeks of the study. Aldosterone levels were significantly reduced by all treatments. The results suggest a beneficial role for endothelium in hypertension. Reduced renal perfusion pressure probably underlies the beneficial renal effects of high-dose valsartan.

JRAAS 2000;1:151-158.

PAPERBinding characteristics of [3H]-irbesartan to human recombinant angiotensin type 1 receptors
Patrick ML Vanderheyden, Ilse Verheijen, Frederik LP Fierens, Jean-Paul De Backer, Georges Vauquelin

The aim of the present work was to investigate the binding properties of the selective AT1-receptor antagonist irbesartan to human AT1-receptors by direct radioligand binding. For this purpose the specific binding of [3H]-irbesartan to intact Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells expressing human recombinant AT1-receptors was determined. Specific binding of [3H]-irbesartan rapidly reached equilibrium and was saturable with a KD of 1.94 ± 0.12 to a homogeneous class of binding sites. Its binding was inhibited by other AT1 antagonists (AIIAs) with the same potency order as previous results from [3H]-angiotensin II and [3H]-candesartan binding to human AT1-receptors. Whereas the dissociation rate of [3H]-irbesartan was essentially independent of the radioligand concentration, it was much slower at 12°C when compared with 37°C. Moreover, the dissociation rate was similar, as determined in washout experiments in the absence or presence of unlabelled AT1 antagonists. At 37°C the dissociation rate constant corresponded to a half-life of approximately seven minutes, which is sufficient to explain the partially insurmountable inhibition by irbesartan in previous studies. In contrast, other phenomena such as the plasma half life and tissue-related factors are necessary to explain its sustained in vivo antihypertensive effect.

JRAAS 2000;1:159-165.

PAPERMolecular mechanism(s) of insulin action on the expression of the angiotensinogen gene in kidney proximal tubular cells
Xiao-Hua Wu, Xing Chen, Shao-Ling Zhang, Li Pang, Catherine To, Tian-Tian Wang, Thomas C Hohman, Janos G Filep, John SD Chan

To investigate the molecular mechanism(s) of insulin action on the expression of the angiotensinogen (ANG) gene in kidney proximal tubular cells, we constructed a fusion gene, pOGH (hANG N-1064/+27), containing the 5'-flanking regulatory sequence of the human ANG gene fused with the human growth hormone (hGH) gene as a reporter and stably integrated the fusion gene into the opossum kidney (OK) cell genomes. The level of expression of pOGH (hANG N-1064/+27) was quantified by the amount of immunoreactive hGH secreted into the medium. The addition of a high level of D(+)-glucose (25 mM) or phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA, 10-7 M) stimulated the expression of the fusion gene in OK cells. The stimulatory effect of glucose (25 mM) was blocked by insulin and tolrestat (an inhibitor of aldose reductase). Tolrestat also inhibited the increase of cellular DAG and PKC activity stimulated by 25 mM glucose. While insulin did not affect the cellular DAG and PKC activity, it did block the stimulatory effect of high glucose (25 mM) and PMA on the expression of the fusion gene. Finally, PD98059 (an inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK)) enhanced the stimulatory effect of high levels of glucose and blocked the inhibitory effect of insulin on the expression of the fusion gene as well as on the phosphorylation of MEK and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK). In contrast, Wortmannin (an inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase) did not block the inhibitory effect of insulin on the ANG gene expression. These studies demonstrate that the action of insulin, blocking the stimulatory effect of a high level of D(+)-glucose (25 mM) on the ANG gene expression is mediated, at least in part, via the 5'-flanking region of the ANG gene and MAPK signal transduction pathway.

JRAAS 2000;1:166-174.

POPULAR
TOPIC
PAPERLosartan inhibits in vitro platelet activation: comparison with candesartan and valsartan
Antonio Núñez, Juan Gómez, Luis Rico Zalba, Mercedes Montón, Ana Jiménez, Sandra Velasco, Almudena López-Blaya, Angel Celdrán Uriarte, Santos Casado, Antonio López-Farré

A recent study has shown that losartan, an AT1-receptor antagonist, interacts with thromboxane A2 (TxA2)/prostaglandin H2 (PGH2) receptors in human platelets. The aim of the present study was to analyse the ability of different angiotensin II (Ang II) AT1-receptor antagonists to inhibit TxA2-dependent human platelet activation. Platelets were obtained from healthy volunteers and were stimulated with the thromboxane A2 analogue, U46619 (10-6 mol/L). U46619-stimulated platelet activation was significantly reduced by losartan in a dose-dependent manner. Only maximal doses of valsartan (5x10-6 mol/L), reduced U46619-induced platelet activation. The active form of candesartan cilexetil, candesartan (CV-11974), failed to modify platelet activation. Losartan reduced the binding of [3H]-U46619 to platelets, an effect that was observed to a lesser extent with valsartan but not with CV-11974. These results suggest that, whilst some AT1-receptor antagonists reduce TxA2-dependent human platelet activation, it is not a feature common to all AT1 antagonists.

JRAAS 2000;1:175-179.

PAPERNitric oxide mediates inhibitory effect of losartan on angiotensin-induced contractions in hamster but not rat aorta
Kiyo Inoue, Hikaru Nishimura, Jiro Kubota, Yasushi Kitaura

We investigated a possible contribution of nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandins to the inhibitory effect of losartan on contractions to Ang I (10-6 M) and Ang II (10-7 M) with or without L-NAME (10-4 M) or indomethacin (10-5 M) in the aorta of WKY, SHR and hamster (n=7 each). Rings of thoracic aorta (2-mm long) were placed in a myograph (5 ml). Endothelium-dependent vasodilations were evaluated with acetylcholine (10-8 ~ 10-6 M). After a 45-minute incubation with L-NAME under a resting tension of 2 g, only hamster aorta contracted (p<0.01). The SHR aorta showed impaired relaxations to acetylcholine compared with the WKY and hamster aorta (p<0.05). Despite the difference in the stimulated NO release, losartan completely abolished the responses to Ang I and Ang II both in WKY and SHR vessels irrespective of the presence of L-NAME. In contrast to the rat aorta, the inhibitory effect of losartan was attenuated in the presence of L-NAME in the hamster aorta (78% vs 99% inhibition, p<0.05). Indomethacin did not alter the effect of losartan in any vessels. Our results suggest that the presence of NO, particularly a basal secretion of NO, is necessary for the full expression of the inhibitory effect of losartan in the hamster, but not in WKY or SHR, aorta. Unlike NO, prostaglandins do not appear to play a role in the effect of losartan.

JRAAS 2000;1:180-183.

POPULAR
TOPIC
PAPERCardioprotection after angiotensin II type 1 blockade involves angiotensin II type 2 receptor expression and activation of protein kinase C-ε in acutely reperfused myocardial infarction in the dog.
Effect of UP269-6 and losartan on AT1-and AT2-receptor expression and IP3 receptor and PKCε proteins

Yi Xu, Vijayan Menon, Bodh I Jugdutt

To determine whether cardioprotection after chronic angiotensin II (Ang II) type 1 (AT1) receptor blockade involves Ang II type 2 (AT2) receptor expression and protein kinase C-ε (PKCε) activation, we measured in vivo haemodynamics and left ventricular (LV) remodelling and dysfunction (echocardiogram/ Doppler) and ex vivo AT1/AT2-receptor expression, IP3R (1, 4, 5-inositol trisphosphate type 2 receptor) and PKCε proteins in dogs with acutely reperfused (90 minutes ischaemia, 90 minutes reperfusion) myocardial infarction (MI) following seven days of AT1-receptor blockade with oral losartan or UP269-6. The animals were randomised to sham; sham + losartan or UP269-6; MI alone; MI + losartan; MI + UP269-6. More marked AT1-receptor blockade with UP269-6 (greater inhibition of Ang II pressor responses) was associated with a smaller increase in preload, less systolic and diastolic dysfunction, less infarct expansion, and smaller LV diastolic and systolic volumes. However, both AT1-receptor antagonists decreased infarct size. Importantly, MI decreased AT1-receptor and AT2-receptor expression while MI after AT1-receptor antagonism increased AT1-receptor (mRNA, not protein) and AT2-receptor (mRNA and protein) expression as well as IP3R and PKCε proteins and cyclic guanosine 3', 5' monophosphate (cGMP). These results suggest that cardioprotection induced by chronic AT1-receptor antagonism involves enhanced AT2-receptor expression and possibly downstream signalling through IP3R, PKCε and cGMP.

JRAAS 2000;1:184-195.

PAPERAngiotensin II does not mediate the pressor response to PGD2 (icv)
Amir Kershenovich, Mary Lee Terrell, Joan Y Summy-Long, Massako Kadekaro

The objective of the present studies was to examine the interaction between brain-derived angiotensin II (Ang II) and prostaglandins in order to identify the mechanisms mediating the pressor response produced by these neuroregulators. Inhibiting synthesis of prostaglandins with indomethacin [indocin, 200 μg/ 5 μl artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF)], administered intracerebroventricularly (icv) to conscious adult male Sprague-Dawley rats, reduced blood pressure to values below basal levels. When injected prior to Ang II (50 ng/5 μl aCSF; icv), indomethacin completely abolished the pressor response induced by the octapeptide. The increase in blood pressure produced by prostaglandin D2 (PGD2, 20 μg/5 μl; icv), the most prominent prostaglandin in the rat brain, however, was not prevented by losartan (25 μg/5 μl; icv), an Ang II AT1-receptor antagonist. Collectively, these results indicate that prostaglandins produced tonically in the brain maintain resting arterial blood pressure and that the pressor action of Ang II is dependent on de novo synthesis of a prostaglandin.

JRAAS 2000;1:196-201.

POPULAR
TOPIC
PAPERLosartan reduces sympathetic nerve outflow from the brain of rats with chronic renal failure
Vito M Campese, Shaohua Ye, Rex H Truong, Michael Gamburd

Sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activity, measured by norepinephrine (NE) turnover rate, was greater in the posterior hypothalamic (PH) nuclei, the paraventricular nuclei (PVN), and the locus coeruleus (LC) of 5/6 nephrectomised (CRF) rats than of control rats. NE secretion from the PH was also greater in CRF than in control rats. These findings demonstrate that SNS activity plays an important role in the genesis of hypertension associated with CRF. The increase in central SNS activity was mitigated by increased local expression of nitric oxide synthase (NOS)-mRNA and nitric oxide (NOx) production. Because angiotensin II may stimulate the central SNS, we tested the hypothesis that losartan, a specific angiotensin II AT1-receptor antagonist, may lower blood pressure (BP), at least in part, by central noradrenergic inhibition. To this end, we studied two groups of CRF rats. One group received losartan (10 mg/kg body weight) in drinking water between the 3rd and 4th week after nephrectomy, the second group received drinking water without losartan. SNS activity was measured by NE secretion from the PH using the microdialysis technique. NOS-mRNA gene expression was also measured by RT-PCR in the PH, PVN, and LC of CRF and control rats. Losartan reduced systolic BP from 184±3.7 to 152±3.1 mmHg and NE secretion from the PH from 340±9.7 to 247±4.8 pg/ml. CRF rats treated with losartan manifested a significant (p<0.01) increase in the expression of nNOS-mRNA in the PH (from 84±1.2 to 99±2.6), the PVN (from 44±1.5 to 63±2.1), and the LC (from 59±6.7 to 76±2.1). CRF rats also manifested a significant increase (p<0.01) in the expression of IL-1β in the PH (from 41.6±2.8 to 54.3±1.4), PVN (from 44±1.9 to 54±1.5), and LC (from 35.5±1.6 to 53.5±1.9).
In conclusion, these studies suggest that the antihypertensive action of losartan in CRF rats may be mediated, at least in part, by inhibition of central SNS outflow. The studies also suggest that the inhibitory action of losartan on the SNS may be mediated by activation of IL-1β, which, in turn, stimulates nNOS, an important modulator of central SNS activity.

JRAAS 2000;1:202-208.

EDITORIAL REVIEWACE inhibitors in hypertension: Still a shortage of evidence
Peter Sever

Two studies have recently been reported comparing angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I)-based treatment with older drugs in hypertensive patients. The hypothesis being tested was that newer drugs would confer a benefit (25% relative risk reduction in total cardiovascular events) compared with other drugs. In retrospect, these objectives were unrealistic based on observations from earlier meta-analyses.
In the event, neither trial demonstrated any clear advantages of ACE-I over treatment with older drugs. Larger trials, such as The Anglo Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT) and Antihypertensive and the Lipid-Lowering treatment to prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT), will address the question of whether newer treatment regimens reduce coronary heart disease (CHD) risk compared with older drugs and further meta-analyses, such as that reported by the Hypertension Triallists' Collaboration, may shed further insight into this important question.

JRAAS 2000;1:117-118.

EDITORIAL REVIEWACE inhibition and the kidney: species variation in the mechanisms responsible for the renal haemodynamic response
M Cecilia Lansang, Norman K Hollenberg

The mechanisms by which angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) reduce the progression of renal injury in diabetes mellitus and other forms of nephropathy remains unclear, in particular whether the major influence is by inhibition of angiotensin II (Ang II) formation, or by inhibition of kininase II and the consequent potentiation of bradykinin (BK), prostaglandin (PG) and nitric oxide (NO) vasodilatory pathways. In addition, the possibility of important species differences in the pathways by which ACE-I affect the kidneys has been suggested. The current paper makes a systematic review of the published literature. Studies were categorised according to their method of assessing the mechanisms of ACE-I action; some studies measured plasma levels of the relevant hormones after ACE-I administration, whereas others measured haemodynamic responses when ACE-I were administered in conjunction with other drugs, including angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and agents which block BK, PG and NO pathways. Experiments in rat, dog and rabbit were analysed separately and compared with the limited data available in humans. As the analysis proceeded, it became clear that there were obvious similarities between rat and dog and so the results from these species are discussed together in this review.
Overall, the available data suggest important species differences in the mechanisms responsible for the renal haemodynamic response to ACE inhibition. In the rat and dog, there seems to be a substantial contribution from BK-dependent mechanisms. In contrast, in rabbit and humans, only minor contributions are made by this pathway, the major effect being due to a reduction in Ang II formation.

JRAAS 2000;1:119-124.

POPULAR
TOPIC
EDITORIAL REVIEWAT1-signalling in vascular smooth muscle
Alun D Hughes

Angiotensin II activates multiple signalling pathways in vascular smooth muscle. The precise pattern of signals and their relative importance to a particular functional response depends on both cell type and differentiation state. Although the contractile and trophic effects of Ang II are often thought of as distinct responses it is increasingly difficult to differentiate them in terms of signalling pathways. Since vasoconstriction and abnormal growth are both features of circulatory diseases such as hypertension and atherosclerosis a better understanding of the signalling pathways responsible for the vasoconstrictor and trophic actions of this peptide may help define novel therapeutic targets in cardiovascular disease.

JRAAS 2000;1:125-130.

EDITORIAL REVIEWOngoing Clinical trials with angiotensin II receptor antagonists in chronic heart failure and myocardial infarction
John McMurray, Colin Berry

A number of large scale landmark trials have shown that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) reduce mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Recently it has been shown that the use of high doses of ACE-I are more effective in this respect than low doses and moreover, that blocking the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) with an aldosterone antagonist in addition to an ACE-I is also more effective than ACE inhibition alone. With the introduction of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) into clinical practice, the question arises as to whether these will have a role in the management of CHF and acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
These drugs are likely to confer greater benefit than placebo and, in theory, may even prove to be superior to ACE-I because of more complete blockade of the actions of angiotensin II (Ang II) . Alternatively, they may prove to be similar in terms of efficacy, but with the benefit of improved tolerability. It is also possible that a combination of an ACE-I and an ARB will be more clinically effective than monotherapy with either agent alone.
This review examines the available data on comparisons of ARBs and placebo, ARBs and ACE-I, and the combination of ACE-I and ARBs vs. monotherapy, in the treatment of patients with CHF and AMI. The progress and design of ongoing trials with ARBs in CHF and AMI are also discussed.

JRAAS 2000;1:131-136.

EDITORIAL REVIEWInsights derived from ACE knockout mice
Justin Cole, Dilek Ertoy, Kenneth E Bernstein

The evaluation of ACE knockout mice has illustrated the tremendous physiologic importance of the RAAS. We have discussed how interruption of this system influences blood pressure, renal function, renal development, serum and urine electrolyte composition, haematocrit and male reproductive capacity. This body of data underlines the modelling of the RAAS as a type of biological machine that is positioned to respond to environmental insult and to maintain a homeostasis of blood pressure, blood volume and electrolyte composition. These data also emphasise Harry Goldblatt's seminal observation that the kidney and the RAAS are intimately linked in the regulation of normal blood pressure.

JRAAS 2000;1:137-141.

POPULAR
TOPIC
EDITORIAL REVIEWThe renin angiotensin system and cardiovascular disease: hope or hype?
Bryan Williams

The HOPE study has provided important new data with regard to cardiovascular protection for patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease. Its results demonstrate that ACE-inhibition and the associated blood pressure reduction are unequivocally beneficial in high risk patients and any strategy that imparts benefit in a high risk group, whatever the mechanism, should be deployed. Nevertheless, the pathophysiological basis for this benefit is not unimportant. If there is a benefit that is independent of blood pressure reduction, related to blockade of the RAAS or potentiation of bradykinin by ACE-inhibition, then this represents a key advance and should prompt further study into the pathophysiological basis of this effect in order that it may be optimised. It also raises important questions. For instance, what is the dose of ACE-inhibition required for maximal benefit? Is bradykinin important in this response? If so, would the benefit be reproduced by angiotensin II receptor antagonists?
In contrast, if the benefit observed in the HOPE study is largely related to systemic blood pressure reduction, it questions the validity of the concept of "normotension" in patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease. It would also pose the question as to whether blood pressure thresholds for intervention with drug therapy and targets on therapy should be lowered beyond current guidance for patients at high cardiovascular risk.
The HOPE study results were heralded by much hype in the lay press and have been followed by an almost evangelical embracing of the RAAS hypothesis. In today's clinical research environment this has become inevitable, but should not replace the need for objective appraisal of the data and their scientific and clinical implications. I strongly support the view that inappropriate activation of the RAAS and other neurohumoral mediators contributes to premature cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and that blockade of the RAAS will most likely provide cardiovascular benefits beyond blood pressure reduction. However, when clinical studies, such as HOPE, are designed in which an RAAS blocking agent challenges placebo, some blood pressure reduction is inevitable. It may seem trivial but in high risk patients, over a long duration of study, its impact cannot be considered less relevant or less important than the non-haemodynamic actions of RAAS blockade. The mechanism of benefit of ramipril in the HOPE study is unresolved. Nevertheless, this important study has broadened the spectrum of cardiovascular diseases amenable to intervention by blockade of the RAAS. In so doing the hype may be justified in that it offers high risk patients improved hope of prolonged survival, whatever the mechanism. The clinical pragmatist might rightly conclude that is enough.

JRAAS 2000;1:142-146.

EDITORIAL REVIEWPersistent formation of angiotensin II despite treatment with maximally recommended doses of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with chronic heart failure
Sam Hanon, Pugazhendi Vijayaraman, Edmund H Sonnenblick, Thierry H Le Jemtel

Plasma levels of Angiotensin II (Ang II) rise during long-term administration of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). The rise in Ang II plasma levels indicate that, despite ACE inhibition, the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) remains persistently elevated in these patients. The added benefits of Ang II type I (AT1)-receptor antagonists in patients with CHF who are already treated with ACE inhibitors (ACE-I) also point to persistent activation of RAAS.
The mechanisms that are responsible for persistent RAAS activation are incomplete inhibition of ACE by current doses of ACE-I and/or continued Ang II formation via pathways other than ACE. Accordingly, the level of ACE inhibition was assessed in 42 patients with CHF treated with maximal doses of ACE-I, by the pressure response to ascending doses of angiotensin I (Ang I). The pressure response to Ang I was measured before and 2 hours after 80 mg of valsartan. In all patients the pressure response to Ang I was lower after administration of valsartan. In 11 patients treated with 80 mg of lisinopril or fosinopril for one week, the pressure response to Ang I was unaltered by valsartan. Thus current doses of ACE-I do not achieve complete inhibition of ACE in patients with CHF.

JRAAS 2000;1:147-150.