![]() |
17th May 2008 @ 2:16pm |
| Subscribe | Instructions To Authors | Advertising/Supplements | Contact Us | Help |
|
Volume 2, Number 1, March 2001POPULAR Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) plays a crucial role in the generation of angiotensin II (Ang II) via conversion from angiotensin I (Ang I). There has been substantial recent interest in non-ACE pathways of Ang II generation in the heart, large arteries, and the kidney. In the case of the human kidney, studied when in balance on a low-salt diet, the renal haemodynamic response to Ang II antagonists substantially exceeds the renal response to ACE inhibitors (ACE-I), suggesting that about 30–40% of Ang II-generation occurs via non-ACE pathways. In this study, we examined the relative contribution of non-ACE pathways, by comparing the response to candesartan and to captopril at the top of the dose-response in normal humans when in balance on a low-salt, as well as a high-salt, diet. As anticipated on a low-salt diet, the increase in renal plasma flow (RPF) in response to candesartan (165±14 mL/min/1.73m2) significantly exceeded the response to captopril (118±12 mL/min/1.73m2; p<0.01). In subjects studied on a high-salt diet, the response to candesartan (97±20 mL/min/1.73m2) also significantly exceeded the response to captopril on the same diet (30±15 mL/min/1.73m2; p<0.01). This remarkable response to candesartan in subjects on a high-salt diet, when compared with the response to captopril, suggests that non-ACE-dependent Ang II generation was influenced less than the classical renal pathway with an increase in salt intake, so that the percentage of Ang II generated via the non-ACE pathway rose to the 60–70% range. JRAAS 2001;2:14-18. PAPEREffect of valsartan and captopril in rabbit carotid injury. Possible involvement of bradykinin in the antiproliferative action of the renin-angiotensin blockade The effects of the specific angiotensin II (Ang II) AT1-receptor blocker valsartan on events related to restenosis were investigated in rabbits after common carotid balloon injury. Six animals were given valsartan from two days prior to injury until 14 days post-injury. Three control groups (n=6 in each group) were either sham-operated, untreated or treated with the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, captopril. Both ACE inhibition and AT1-receptor blockade had marked effects on plasma levels of endothelin ET1, thromboxane TXB2 and 6-keto-PGF1-alpha. The most dramatic effects on ET1 levels were seen in rabbits treated with valsartan, where levels were reduced to values close to those for sham-operated animals (96.85 vs. 86.45 pg/ml). Captopril treatment led to a statistically significant (p<0.01) reduction in ET1 levels compared with untreated animals, but the reduction was only about half that seen with AT1- receptor blockade. TXB2 levels doubled (202.58 vs. 413.28 pg/ml) upon arterial injury in control animals but rose by only 20–35% in rabbits treated with captopril (246.45 pg/ml) or valsartan (268.13). In untreated animals, 6-keto-PGF1-alpha levels decreased slightly after injury, but for both the captopril and valsartan groups, there were significant increases in levels of this prostaglandin derivative, effects attributed to the action of bradykinins. Levels were highest in the captopril-treated animals. Valsartan and captopril treatment led to a significant reduction in neointimal thickness and the extent of lumen stenosis compared with untreated animals. Both treatments were effective in reducing neointimal area and significantly (p<0.05) reduced cell proliferation. The differences between treatments can be attributed to the different actions of the agents, as valsartan leaves the AT2-receptor unblocked, while captopril, through inhibition of Ang II synthesis, prevents stimulation of both receptors. A combination of both treatments may be a possible way forward in the clinical prevention of restenosis. JRAAS 2001;2:19-24. POPULAR Introduction: Marked heterogeneity characterises
blood pressure (BP) responses to antihypertensive drugs. The efficacy of drugs acting
on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is predicted (albeit weakly)
by plasma renin activity (PRA) and it has been assumed that, within
individuals, there would be concordance in efficacy
between drugs acting at different sites to block the RAAS. JRAAS 2001;2:25-30. PAPERComparative antihypertensive and renoprotective effects of telmisartan and lisinopril after long-term treatment in hypertensive diabetic rats This study compared the cardiovascular and renal effects of long-term telmisartan (3 and 10 mg/kg/day) and lisinopril (10 mg/kg/day) in an animal model combining hypertension and diabetes mellitus. It was a parallel-group study of diabetic, spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), treated with control or active treatment for eight months. A non-diabetic SHR control group was run in parallel. Diabetes was induced by streptozotocin (45 mg/kg i.v.) in SHRs aged 9–10 weeks. Animals were treated with telmisartan (3 or 10 mg/kg/day), lisinopril (10 mg/kg/day) or vehicle. Plasma glucose levels, blood pressure (BP), and urinary protein and albumin excretion were measured monthly. Telmisartan treatment significantly reduced BP of diabetic SHRs in a dose-dependent manner (p<0.05, low-dose, n=18; p<0.01, high-dose, n=15). The BP reduction in the lisinopril group was similar to that in the telmisartan 10 mg/kg/day group. Compared with non-diabetic SHRs, untreated diabetic SHRs developed severe proteinuria and albuminuria over the experimental period (p<0.01). In diabetic SHRs, proteinuria and albuminuria were dose-dependently and significantly attenuated by treatment with telmisartan (p<0.01 with the higher dose) and lisinopril (p<0.01). Compared with the untreated diabetic SHRs, cardiac hypertrophy was significantly reduced after treatment with both doses of telmisartan and with lisinopril. Telmisartan, 10 mg/kg/ day, but not lisinopril, significantly attenuated the diabetes-induced increase in glomerular volume. In conclusion, telmisartan, 10 mg/kg/day, is at least as beneficial as lisinopril, 10 mg/kg/day, in lowering BP, reducing cardiac hypertrophy and attenuating renal excretion of protein and albumin in this model. JRAAS 2001;2:31-36. PAPERThe influence of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on the aorta elastin metabolism in diet-induced hypercholesterolaemia in rabbits Aortic elastin turnover is significantly accelerated in atherosclerosis, partly because of activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system caused by hypercholesterolaemia. We postulated that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) prevent the aortic elastin loss in experimental hypercholesterolaemia. Two doses of ACE-I (captopril, enalapril and quinapril) were used: a dose equivalent to that applied to human subjects and a dose 10 times higher. We found that the increase in serum and aortic elastolytic activity in cholesterol-fed rabbits was prevented by high-dose captopril. The elastin content in aorta homogenates from cholesterol-fed rabbits was significantly decreased. The higher dose of captopril, but no other ACE-I, prevented this decrease in aortic elastin content. In cholesterol-fed rabbits the elastin-bound calcium content was significantly elevated. The higher doses of captopril and enalapril lowered the elastin-bound calcium content. In serum and aortic homogenates of cholesterol-fed rabbits, ACE activity was elevated by 15% and 77%, respectively. Both doses of captopril, enalapril and quinapril prevented this cholesterol-induced increase in serum and aortic ACE activity. We conclude that: 1) administration of captopril at doses 10 times higher than those used in humans prevents hypercholesterolaemia increased aortic elastin loss. 2) higher doses of captopril and enalapril prevent the hypercholesterolaemia-induced increase in aortic elastin-bound calcium. JRAAS 2001;2:37-42. POPULAR Angiotensin II (Ang II) is the effector molecule of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS). This small peptide binds cell surface receptors to maintain a wide variety of haemodynamic responses including salt and water balance, blood pressure and vascular tone. Ang II can also act as a potent growth factor. Under certain conditions however, its growth-promoting effects can be deleterious and lead to vascular disease. The intracellular signalling mechanisms by which the Ang II type 1 (AT1) receptor converts ligand binding to the appropriate cellular response are the focus of this review. Here, the classical signalling pathway utilising heterotrimeric G proteins is discussed. In addition, more recent work examining the role of tyrosine phosphorylation signalling cascades is also examined. Defining the biochemical signalling pathways by which Ang II mediates its physiological effects will advance our understanding of how such a simple molecule elicits such a wide variety of important cellular responses. Furthermore, it may delineate the mechanisms by which Ang II generates a normal vs. an abnormal cellular response, the results of which lead to vascular disease states that are routinely seen in humans. JRAAS 2001;2:4-10. POPULAR Outcome data from randomised controlled trials in hypertensive patients have shown that, in patients aged 65–79 years, there are clear benefits of antihypertensive treatment in those with a sustained systolic blood pressure (SBP) of >160 mmHg, irrespective of diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Although not definitively proven, it is also probable that treating a sustained DBP of >90 mmHg is beneficial. JRAAS 2001;2:11-13. CASE STUDYHypertension due to a giant aldosterone-secreting adenoma The syndrome of hypertension due to a benign aldosterone-secreting adenoma of the zona glomerulosa of the adrenal cortex was first described by Jerome Conn in 1955.1 Since then, a great many case series have been published2-3 and the criteria for the biochemical and histopathological diagnosis have been extensively reported. The tumours are classically canary yellow and rarely more than 1 cm in diameter.4 We report the clinical course of a long-standing hypertensive patient with possibly the largest benign adenoma in the Western medical literature. JRAAS 2001;2:43-44. |